Apple Shares Details on Parental Control App Removals Apple has responded to a New York Times report that claimed it was removing third-party screen-time and parental-control apps from the App Store, a move some considered anti-competitive, considering Apple offers its own Screen Time feature as part of iOS 12.

A young child, wearing a blue and black striped shirt, sits at a table and interacts with a tablet using both hands. An Apple logo is visible on the device. The background includes a wooden chair and a piece of furniture, partially in view, adding a cozy, homey atmosphere.

Over the past year, the company has removed at 11 of the 17 most downloaded parental control apps from the App Store, according to data from The New York Times and Sensor Tower.

Apple has also removed a number of lesser-known parental control apps from the App Store without comment or context; developers were given no warning for the ban. The good news is that it still retained a few good ones like Bark and the Aura protection app.

According to The New York Times, Apple even forced companies to remove features from applications that allowed users to control other devices – for example, their childrenā€™s apps – or applications that blocked access to particular content, like adult material on kidā€™s iPads.

In other cases, the company simply removed the apps from the App Store altogether.

Removed out of the blue

One developer told The New York Times that his app was removed from the App Store ā€œout of the blue with no warning,ā€ and as such the company has received a number of complaints filed both to the European Union’s competition office and Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab over anti-competitive behavior, limiting developers from earning a living.

When questioned by The New York Times, an Apple spokeswoman said that Apple treats “all apps the same,” and that the apps featured in the report ā€œcould gain too much information from users’ devices,ā€ which was why they were rejected from the App Store.

Phil Schiller weighs in

Following this, popular Apple news website MacRumors spoke to Phil Schiller, and he said that ā€œover the last year, we became aware that some parental management apps were using a technology called Mobile Device Management or ā€œMDMā€ and installing an MDM Profile as a method to limit and control the use of these devices.

ā€œMDM is a technology that gives one party access to and control over many devices, it was meant to be used by a company on its own mobile devices as a management tool, where that company has a right to all of the data and use of the devices.

ā€œThe MDM technology is not intended to enable a developer to have access to and control over consumersā€™ data and devices, but the apps we removed from the store did just that. No one, except you, should have unrestricted access to manage your childā€™s device, know their location, track their app use, control their mail accounts, web surfing, camera use, network access, and even remotely erase their devices.

ā€œFurther, security research has shown that there is a risk that MDM profiles could be used as a technology for hacker attacks by assisting them in installing apps for malicious purposes on usersā€™ devices.ā€

Apple defends its decision

Since then, Apple has made a public statement on the ongoing row, telling users that ā€œparents shouldnā€™t have to trade their fears of their childrenā€™s device usage for risks to privacy and security, and the App Store should not be a platform to force this choice. No one, except you, should have unrestricted access to manage your childā€™s device.ā€

ā€œThis isnā€™t a matter of competition. Itā€™s a matter of securityā€

The company added: ā€œWhen we found out about these guideline violations, we communicated these violations to the app developers, giving them 30 days to submit an updated app to avoid availability interruption in the App Store. Several developers released updates to bring their apps in line with these policies. Those that didnā€™t were removed from the App Store.ā€

What do you think? Is Apple right to block such apps from the App Store, or is it stunting the growth of hard-working developers trying to implement new features for parents? Let us know on Twitter using @AppleMagazine, and check back soon for more on Apple, every day of the week.

Tagged:
Newsroom
About the Author

News content on AppleMagazine.com is produced by our editorial team and complements more in-depth editorials which youā€™ll find as part of our weekly publication. AppleMagazine.com provides a comprehensive daily reading experience, offering a wide view of the consumer technology landscape to ensure you're always in the know. Check back every weekday for more. Editorial Team | Masthead ā€“ AppleMagazine Digital Publication